Page 1 of 1
Deadliest Warrior
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 4:56 am
by Nostalgiascape
I love the show. I have to say though, when they decided Apache would kill Roman Gladiator. I call BS. And I have reasons for saying so.
Re: Deadliest Warrior
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:20 am
by Pumpkin_Man
I don't know about that. If they were to pair an Apache Warior up with a Roman Gladiator, that would be a pretty even match. Both were trained to be deadly, and both have to be in absolute top physical condition. I guess it would come down to who was the best at their particular fighting technique. The apache were very firesum in their use of their weapons. The ancient Romans had a definate technological advance, but again, it all comes down th the individual fighter.
Mike
Re: Deadliest Warrior
Posted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 6:33 pm
by SpookShowBaby
I didn't think the viking would loose to the samurai either, but mostly it is a decent show.
Re: Deadliest Warrior
Posted: Mon Jul 06, 2009 10:16 am
by Pumpkin_Man
Comparing those three is like comparing the various martial arts. For instance, if you take some one who's a black belt in karate, and par him off with some one who'e a black belt in Kung Fu, it would hard to tell who would win. It would all boil down to who was the better fighter, and it would make no difference which fighting techniques he used. Samari Wariors, Vikings and Roman Gladiators, likewise, were the TOP NOTCH fighters of their time and places. If you were to grab one of each of those classes of Wariors from their place in History, and place them in a ring, it would not make a difference which technique they used. The best fighter of the three would come out the winner.
Mike
Re: Deadliest Warrior
Posted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:54 pm
by ElMuertoMan17
Although I have not seen the show before, I would say the Samurai are the the deadliest warriors.